论善意取得制度中善意要件的证明

《物权法》第106条确立的善意要件的证明责任规则,只能解释为主张善意取得的第三人负担证明责任。尽管善意要件的证明有一定难度,但通过间接证据的运用、经验则的援引以及对方当事人事实主张责任的加重,证明该要件是完全可能的。立法论上关于这一问题的讨论,需要结合诸如进攻者角色、盖然性衡量、证明接近之类的实质性因素,以及公示方式与交易习惯、诉讼程序的实际运作、法律政治考量之类的外部因素进行。

On Proof of Good Faith Requirements in the Bona Fide Acquisition System

The regulation on proof burden of good faith requirements defined by Article 106 of the Property Law can only be interpreted as a claim that the third party of acquired in good faith takes the proof burden.Although the proof of good faith requirements is of certain difficulties,it is completely possible to proof these requirements through using indirect evidence,introducing experience rules and increasing the claim burden of fact of the opposite party.Discussions over this issue on legislation theory need to combine substantial factors,like the role of offender,balance of probability on proof and approach to proof,with external factors,like publication method and trading habits,the actual implementation of litigation procedures and legal and political considerations.