对我国“非法证据排除规则”研究的梳理——之(一)是什么?为什么? |
| |
引用本文: | 中卫市人民检察院课题组. 对我国“非法证据排除规则”研究的梳理——之(一)是什么?为什么?[J]. 甘肃政法成人教育学院学报, 2009, 0(6): 130-133 |
| |
作者姓名: | 中卫市人民检察院课题组 |
| |
作者单位: | 中卫市人民检察院,宁夏,中卫,751700 |
| |
摘 要: | 对“非法证据”的理解,有广义和狭义两种。非法证据排除规则中所谓的“非法证据”,应在狭义上理解,即指执法、司法官员经由非法程序或使用非法方法取得的证据。在我国,非法证据排除规则被热议,首因是其被寄寓了遏制非法取证的厚望。对非法证据排除之遏制非法取证功能的质疑,在我国缺乏力量;非法证据排除规则并不能独立承担起防止错案的重任,防止错案也不是其当然功能。
|
关 键 词: | 非法证据 非法取证 错案 |
Thoughts on the Exclusionary Rules of Illegal Evidence |
| |
Abstract: | Illegal evidence may be understood both in broad and narrow sense. The narrow meaning should be applied in respect to the exclusionay rules, which refers to those proofs that is discovered by relevant persons through inadequate procedures of illegal ways. The rules are heatedly discussed in China, in the hope of circumventing the trend. But there are doubts about its functions. |
| |
Keywords: | Illegal evidence Illegal discovery Errorible case |
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|