信托合同论——来自信托法适用角度的审视

本文认为,只有导致他益信托设立的信托合同才属于第三人利益合同,一些国家的信托法要求信托合同基本条款具备确定性、另一些国家与地区的信托法却无此要求且这一区别涉及到对合同解释制度的适用;一些国家的信托法确认信托合同为诺成合同、另一些国家与地区的信托法则确认这种合同为要物合同;一些国家的信托法有条件地确认信托合同具有强制执行力、另一些国家与地区的信托法却并未作出如此确认且这一区别涉及到是否允许委托人在订立信托合同后反悔。信托合同当事人与第三人的基本权利义务属于由信托法设定并为信托合同接纳的权利义务,受托人违反信托合同的赔偿责任属于向信托财产承担的责任。

On Trust Contract

This article thinks that Only those trust contracts creating benefit - to - other trust belong to the contract for the benefit of a third party. The trust laws of some countries demand the fundamental terms of the trust contract have certainty, while the other countries and areas don't have such demand, and this difference has relation to application of contract interpretation system. The trust Laws of some countries confirm trust contract belong consensual contract by promise, while the other countries and areas confirm The contract belong real contract. The trust laws of some countries confirm enforcement of trust contract conditionally, while the other countries and areas don't make such confirmation, and this difference has relation to whether permit trustor to go back on his promise after making the trust contract. The fundamental rights and duties of the parties and the third party of trust contract are set by trust law and accepted by trust contract. The trustee's compensation liability of breach of trust contract belongs to the liability to trust res.