The National Governance and Policy Context of Social Impact Bond Emergence: A Comparative Analysis of Leaders and Skeptics |
| |
Authors: | Jesse Hajer |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Economics and Labour Studies Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canadajesse.hajer@umanitoba.ca |
| |
Abstract: | AbstractProponents of the Social Impact Bond (SIB) model put forward a value-for-money case for SIBs based on new resources, efficiency enhancements and innovation for social service delivery, suggesting broad potential for SIB uptake in varying national contexts. SIB use has however been concentrated in Anglo-Saxon liberal market economies. This paper analyses the possibility that SIBs are proceeding given their alignment with particular governance and policy regimes, as opposed to any universal superiority from a cost-effectiveness or efficiency perspective. A comparative analysis is undertaken of the United Kingdom and the United States, leaders in SIB implementation, with France and Germany. A range of indicators representing the adoption of neoliberal governance approaches are reviewed and linked to their complementarity with the SIB model. Policy implications for SIB governance are then explored. |
| |
Keywords: | social impact bonds neoliberalism financialization comparative analysis welfare regimes |
|
|