| 论我国法院变更指控制度之构建 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 顾彬.论我国法院变更指控制度之构建[J].湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2010,22(5). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 顾彬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学研究生院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法院是拥有最终定罪权的唯一机关,其对于检察机关指控的变更也是应有之义,但径行的变更则触动了"不告不理"的基本诉讼理念。我国法院的变更指控立法和实践恰恰暴露了这一问题,要解决这一弊病可仿效大陆法系的程序性限制模式,设置我国的"间接变更罪名程序",并辅之以"公诉事实同一"的前提性原则,构建出符合我国司法环境的法院变更指控制度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法院变更指控 间接变更罪名程序 公诉事实同一 |
On Constructing the System of Modifying Accusation by Court in Our Country |
| |
| GU Bin.On Constructing the System of Modifying Accusation by Court in Our Country[J].Journal of Huan Public Security College,2010,22(5). |
| |
| Authors: | GU Bin |
| |
| Institution: | GU Bin(China University of Political Science and Law; Beijing; 100088); |
| |
| Abstract: | Court is the only organ enjoying the right of final conviction,so it can modify the accusation from procuratorial organs.However,the basic litigation concept "no trial without complaint" is changed by it.The legislation and practice of court modifying accusation in our country exposed this problem.To overcome this,we can imitate the procedural limit model in the continental law system,set up our country s procedure of indirect modification of accusation based on the principle of identity of public prosecuti... |
| |
| Keywords: | modify accusation by court procedure of indirect modification of charges identity of public prosecution facts |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
