| 法益与罪数 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈洪兵,吴海春. 法益与罪数[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2006, 21(6): 89-92 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈洪兵 吴海春 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 清华大学法学院,北京,100084
2. 江苏剑桥人律师事务所,江苏,吴江,215200 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 将法益作为判断罪数的唯一标准,确实不尽合理,但是,法益于罪数论意义重大.想象竞合与法条竞合的关于区别在于,在想象竞合情形下,没有哪一个罪名能对行为所侵犯的法益作出全面的刑法评价,相反,在法条竞合情形下,其中一个法条能对法益作出全面的刑法评价.由于连续犯、牵连犯和吸收犯侵犯的都是数法益,从全面评价法益的角度讲,应当实行数罪并罚.认定不可罚的事后行为、事前行为的关键在于,看事后行为、事前行为在本犯之外是否侵犯了新的法益.
|
| 关 键 词： | 法益 想象竞合 连续犯 牵连犯 事后行为 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8628(2006)06-0089-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-07-05 |
Legal interests and crime number |
| |
| CHEN Hong-bing,WU Hai-chun. Legal interests and crime number[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2006, 21(6): 89-92 |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Hong-bing WU Hai-chun |
| |
| Abstract: | It is irrational to regard legal interests as the only standard for judging crime number,while,legal interests is important to theory of crime number.In the condition of the imaginative joinder of offenses,no accusal can make comprehensive criminal estimate for legal interests.But,In the condition of coincidence of law,one of the accusal can make comprehensive criminal estimate for legal interests.Continuous offence absorbed offence and continuous offence should adopt the principle of punishments for plural crimes.The cognizance of the non-criminal behavior before or after the events lies in the fact whether the behavior infringe the new legal interests. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal interests imaginative joinder of offenses continuous offence implicated offense behavior after the events |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
