首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

诉判同一与变更罪名
引用本文:李昌林.诉判同一与变更罪名[J].现代法学,2003,25(2):97-101.
作者姓名:李昌林
作者单位:西南政法大学,重庆,400031
摘    要:法院在刑事诉讼中有最终确定罪名和适用罚条的权力。但是 ,法院的这一权力应当受到控审分离、不告不理、辩护原则等诸多因素的制约 ,并不得迳行做出恶化被告人的处境的判决。本文对法院变更起诉指控的罪名和罚条问题作了比较分析 ,并阐明了我国法院在刑事判决中变更起诉指控的罪名和罚条应当遵循的规则。

关 键 词:诉讼客体  诉讼职能  变更控诉  辩护原则  辩论原则  裁判正当性
文章编号:1001-2397(2003)02-0097-05
修稿时间:2003年2月28日

On the Subject Matter of Criminal Adjudication and Amendment of Charges
LI Chang-lin.On the Subject Matter of Criminal Adjudication and Amendment of Charges[J].Modern Law Science,2003,25(2):97-101.
Authors:LI Chang-lin
Abstract:The criminal court has the final saying upon the application of criminal law. But this power is restricted by many factors such as the principles of the separation of prosecution and trial, no trial without charge, and the doctrines of defense and adversary, of which the most important is the trial court shall not pass adjudication that worsening the plight of the defendants that the charges without prior information. The author gives a comparative law study of the amendment of charges by trial court and points out the principles that shall be abide by when our courts doing so.
Keywords:subject of criminal trial  functions of criminal procedure  amendment of charges  doctrine of defense  doctrine of adversary  justification of adjudication
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号