| 法律解释的悖论与法律论证——一个终结还是开始？ |
| |
| 引用本文： | 夏贞鹏.法律解释的悖论与法律论证——一个终结还是开始？[J].山东警察学院学报,2005,17(2):87-91. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 夏贞鹏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东省教育厅办公室,山东,济南,250014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法律解释学展开的思维基点主要有两种一是难题思维;二是整体或类型思维,也可以称为大全思维.但因为其共同具有的主体性思维特点,产生了法律解释的难题.法律论证理论正是通过主体间性思维取代主体性思维,进一步发展了法律解释学.
|
| 关 键 词： | 疑难案件 大全思维 法律论证 主体间性 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-1565(2005)02-0087-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年2月17日 |
The paradox of legal hermeneutics and legal argumentation |
| |
| Xia zhen-peng.The paradox of legal hermeneutics and legal argumentation[J].Journal of Shandong Police College,2005,17(2):87-91. |
| |
| Authors: | Xia zhen-peng |
| |
| Institution: | Xia zhen-peng |
| |
| Abstract: | Legal argumentation is a new subject of legal theory that sprang up gradually in Europe-continent law system since the 1960's. We arranged the accomplishment of legal hermeneutics and the theoretical paradox that it meet, and pointed out the advancement of legal interpretation was the starting point of legal argumentation. There were mainly two problems: first, law needs to be interpreted; second, legal interpretation has meet theoretical paradox. Under this background, legal argumentation made a new try in theory. |
| |
| Keywords: | hard case the encompassing legal argumatation intersubject |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
