首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

法学之殇
引用本文:张建伟.法学之殇[J].政法论坛,2007(1).
作者姓名:张建伟
作者单位:清华大学 北京100084
摘    要:学非易事,磨砺以求,未必有所成,现如今法学论文人人会写,学术研究似为易事,这类现象的背后是学术出现严重失范、脱序现象。真学术必然要有创新,法学研究必须强调学术原创性,窃人立意,掠人之美,与剽窃词句如出一辙;创制一套新词,制造语言的魔障,也不足取。学者不能不没有一点“专利权”意识,某种学术观点既然有人提出,再当作自己的创见,便属“学术不端”。法学论著最重要的是思想,其价值应当表现在有原创性观点,做不到这一点之所谓“学术”不过是“表态式学术”。缺乏健全的学术批评是当今法学研究保持低劣化和“学术成果”泛滥成灾的一大原因。高质量的法学研究成果需要精工细雕,为减少垃圾学术,学者应有不写或者少写的勇气。

关 键 词:法学论文  原创性  学术批评  专业食槽

Death of the Study of Law
ZHANG Jian-wei.Death of the Study of Law[J].Tribune of Political Science and Law,2007(1).
Authors:ZHANG Jian-wei
Abstract:Academic research is not an easy matter.That there are too many juristic works now in China seems that jurisprudential study is very easy.Simultaneously with research papers in full flourish,academic research is out of order and off form.Academic originality should be stressed.To steal the other's original academic viewpoints is also plagiarism.An honest scholar should have a patent-right sense and do not take credit for what has been done by somebody else.It should not be praised to make and use many new and strange terms and rub a thesis into a magic mirror of language.Academic criticism is very important to deter academic wastes from flooding.A real scholar should have the courage not to write or to write less and better for keeping a high academic level.
Keywords:Juristic Works  Originality  Academic Criticism  Professional Trou  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号