Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications with an optional deadline procedure |
| |
| Authors: | Neil Brewer Nathan Weber Abigail Clark Gary L. Wells |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Psychology , Flinders University , GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001neil.brewer@flinders.edu.au;3. School of Psychology , Flinders University , GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001;4. Iowa State University , Ames, Iowa, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstract Two experiments examined the efficacy of an optional deadline lineup procedure for distinguishing correct from incorrect eyewitness identification decisions. The procedure involved briefly presenting the lineup, removing the lineup from view, then giving participants the option of either making an identification decision or viewing the lineup again. When compared with participants operating under a forced deadline (i.e. forced to respond after the brief presentation) or standard lineup instructions, the optional deadline procedure identified participants with an impressive probability of having made a correct identification when used with target-present lineups and biased instructions. With unbiased instructions, the optional deadline produced clear discrimination between correct and incorrect identification decisions for choosers and, importantly, also for non-choosers. Possible strategies for improving the efficacy of the procedure are suggested. |
| |
| Keywords: | eyewitness identification response latency deadline automatic decision processes |
|
|
