| 试论我国刑法的罪刑法定原则与司法解释 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 尹彦品,张光顺. 试论我国刑法的罪刑法定原则与司法解释[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2005, 0(6): 43-45 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 尹彦品 张光顺 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 河北政法职业学院,河北,石家庄,050061
2. 河北公安警察职业学院,河北,石家庄,050000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 罪刑法定原则在1997年被写入我国刑法典,这是我国刑事法制建设的里程碑,对今后的刑事立法、司法都具有重要意义。最高司法机关颁布的司法解释在保证刑法的正确执行方面发挥了积极作用,但也存在明显的缺陷和不足,特别是存在与罪刑法定原则相偏离的倾向。因此,合理界定二者的关系有利于立法的完善和司法的公正。
|
| 关 键 词： | 罪刑法定原则 司法解释 冲突 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7966(2005)06-0043-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-09-22 |
Commentary on the Rules of Crime''''s Legal Definition and Legal Explanation in Chinese Criminal Law |
| |
| YIN Yan-pin,ZHANG Guang-shun. Commentary on the Rules of Crime''''s Legal Definition and Legal Explanation in Chinese Criminal Law[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2005, 0(6): 43-45 |
| |
| Authors: | YIN Yan-pin ZHANG Guang-shun |
| |
| Abstract: | Principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime have been written into our country's criminal law in 1997,which was taken as a milestone in the process of building justice and rule of law in our country.It by all means is of much significance to the future undertaking of criminal legislation and judicature.Juridical interpretations by the highest legal organs have played a positive and active role in the proper law enforcement process.However they still have evident shortcomings and deficiencies,especially they gradually tend to be aberrant from the right track.In considering that,to give proper and reasonable definition of the relationship between them will be beneficial to the perfection of our legislature and justice of law. |
| |
| Keywords: | doctrine of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime juridical interpretation conflict |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
