| 浅析日常语言中的几种诡辩手法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许涛. 浅析日常语言中的几种诡辩手法[J]. 山东行政学院学报, 2004, 0(6): 124-125 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东财政学院,山东济南,250014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在日常生活工作中 ,经常有人为自己的行为作一些似是而非的辩护 ,实际上是隐含着某种逻辑错误的诡辩。常见的诡辩术有偷换概念、偷换论题、捏造论据和无效推理
|
| 关 键 词： | 诡辩 偷换概念 偷换论题 捏造论据 无效的推理方式 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-3154(2004)06-0124-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-09-01 |
Analysis of Several Kinds of Sophistry in Daily Language |
| |
| XU Tao. Analysis of Several Kinds of Sophistry in Daily Language[J]. Journal of Shandong Administrative College and Shandong Economic Management Personnel College, 2004, 0(6): 124-125 |
| |
| Authors: | XU Tao |
| |
| Abstract: | In everyday life In daily life , it happens frequently that somebody speciously fences for his some behaviors,which is the sophism of some logical errors. The usual sophistry includes tactics that quibble, to correct thinking, reveal that quibbles, defends the truth to offer the logic basis. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sophistry Substitute the Concept for Another Surreptitiously Substitute the Proposition for Another Surreptitiously Fabricate Argument Invalid Reasoning Way |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
