首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事诉讼中的权力制约与监督
引用本文:周标龙.刑事诉讼中的权力制约与监督[J].行政与法,2012(2):104-107.
作者姓名:周标龙
作者单位:衡阳师范学院,湖南衡阳,421008
基金项目:2011年度湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目
摘    要:我国刑事诉讼法构建了制约和监督两种权力监控机制以保障权力的合法行使。权力制约在限制侦查权、起诉权和审判权方面发挥了重要作用,但检察监督的效果并不理想。本文认为,在刑事诉讼中强化检察监督不仅会形成不合理的审判结构,而且不符合警检关系的发展趋势,相比之下制约则更具有优势。因此,我国刑事诉讼权力监控理论需要转型,应从监督论走向制约论。

关 键 词:刑事诉讼  制约  监督

Checking and Supervision of the Powers in Criminal Procedure
Zhou Biaolong.Checking and Supervision of the Powers in Criminal Procedure[J].Public Administration & Law,2012(2):104-107.
Authors:Zhou Biaolong
Institution:Zhou Biaolong
Abstract:There are two ways to confine powers in Criminal Procedure of China:the checking mechanism and the supervision mechanism.The checking mechanism plays positive role in controlling the powers in Criminal Procedure while the supervision mechanism can’t act well.It will form an irrational trial composition and can’t conform to the trend of the development of the relationship between the police and the procurator to strengthen the adjudication supervision.The checking mechanism is more important and more effective than the supervision mechanism.It’s necessary to change the theory of power control from the theory of supervision to the theory of checking in Criminal Procedure of China.
Keywords:criminal procedure  checking  supervision
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号