| 法治治理中的不同推理主体 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董青梅.法治治理中的不同推理主体[J].行政与法,2012(5):106-109. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董青梅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北政法大学,陕西西安,710063 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 高等学校优秀青年教师国内访问学者项目经费资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于参与法律活动的人的角色不同,因而其法律推理的目的、采用的方法也不尽相同。作为私权捍卫者的律师应当竭力为委托人的利益服务,作为制度权威言说者的法官有责任作出正当的裁判,承担教学和学术角色的法学教授则应成为法律智慧的启发者和学术知识的增量扩充者。不同角色主体的参与、争辩、对话,是聚向善治的生命活水和智慧溪流。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律推理 律师 法官 法学教师 |
Different Reasoning Subject in the Rule of Law Governance |
| |
| Dong Qingmei.Different Reasoning Subject in the Rule of Law Governance[J].Public Administration & Law,2012(5):106-109. |
| |
| Authors: | Dong Qingmei |
| |
| Institution: | Dong Qingmei |
| |
| Abstract: | Different role in legal matters affects main objectives and methods in legal reasoning.Lawyer as defender of private rights ought to do their utmost to help his client,The judge as spokesman of institutional authority have responsibility in legitimate judgment,Legal professor as taking teach and engaging in studies should enlight wisdom.Conversation in different subject lead to good governance. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal reasoning lawyer the judge legal professor |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
