首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

禁止重复追诉相关概念辨析
引用本文:孔军,张文杰.禁止重复追诉相关概念辨析[J].行政与法,2012(3):80-84.
作者姓名:孔军  张文杰
作者单位:1. 中国社会科学院,北京,102488
2. 青岛市李沧区人民检察院,山东青岛,266100
摘    要:法学界,既判力、一事不再理和禁止双重危险的界定一向不尽清晰,在理论与实践中均造成了一定的混乱。既判力的基本目的乃是确保实体判决之确定性和终局性,禁止法院就既决事项进行相互矛盾的实体审判,具有实体法的效果,客观上产生一事不再理的效果;一事不再理仅具有程序性效力,约束就同一诉讼标的再行起诉或审理;禁止双重危险主要是保护人民的权利,间接达到确保判决终局性的目的,不以实体判决为前提,且具有争点效。三者有很大不同,不能相互替代、混同使用。

关 键 词:既判力  一事不再理  禁止双重危险  辨析

Discrimination on Prohibit Repeat Recourse Relevant Concepts
Kong Jun,Zhang Wenjie.Discrimination on Prohibit Repeat Recourse Relevant Concepts[J].Public Administration & Law,2012(3):80-84.
Authors:Kong Jun  Zhang Wenjie
Institution:Kong Jun,Zhang Wenjie
Abstract:In legal circles,adjudged force and non bis in idem and prohibition of double jeopardy is not the clear,in judicial practice has caused some confusion.The basic purpose of adjudged force but to ensure that the entity of certainty and finality of the judgment,adjudged force prohibited the court conflicting entity trial,with the effect of substantive law,bis in idem effect of an objective;Things are no longer only reason the effectiveness of the procedural constraints on the same subject matter of litigation further prosecution or proceedings;prohibition of double jeopardy protection of the rights of the people,and indirectly to achieve the purpose of ensuring the finality of the Judgment,not physical judgment,and has a point of contention effect.This three are very different,so can not substitute and confused with each other.
Keywords:adjudged force  bis in idem  prohibition of double jeopardy  discrimination
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号