| 论罪刑法定原则两种解释范式的内在统一——兼论罪刑法定原则的程序意义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何邦武. 论罪刑法定原则两种解释范式的内在统一——兼论罪刑法定原则的程序意义[J]. 政法学刊, 2005, 22(3): 44-46 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何邦武 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中共中山市委,办公室,广东,中山,528403 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 罪刑法定原则的形式主义解释范式(大陆法系)和实质主义解释范式(英美法系)是两大法系不同制度背景下的产物,各有其存在的合理性,从而有着价值取向上的一致性。将两种不同解释范式理解为是罪刑法定原则蕴涵的价值冲突的结果,实是一种误读。
|
| 关 键 词： | 罪刑法定 解释范式 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-3745(2005)03-0044-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-01-12 |
The Intrinsic Unity of Two Interpretation Forms for the Principle of A legally Prescribed Punishment For a Specified Crime |
| |
| He Bang-wu. The Intrinsic Unity of Two Interpretation Forms for the Principle of A legally Prescribed Punishment For a Specified Crime[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2005, 22(3): 44-46 |
| |
| Authors: | He Bang-wu |
| |
| Abstract: | The formalist interpretation (under continental law system) and material interpretation (under Anglo-American law system) for the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime are the products of different law systems. They have their own reason to exist and are coherent in value orientation. It is wrong to interpret the two interpretation forms as the conflict of values. |
| |
| Keywords: | a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime interpretation form |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
