试论朝鲜《广寒楼记》评点的主要特征——与金圣叹《西厢记》评点比较

从16世纪末开始，随着大量的中国通俗小说的流入，小说评点本亦传入朝鲜。在其影响下，朝鲜的汉小说评点也应运而生，小厂主人的《(水山)广寒楼记》评点最具代表性。该书评点有多处与金批《西厢记》的内容类似，一些具体视角又与金批不同。其中，最值得注意的是通过比较《西厢记》与《广寒楼记》的学成果，来评价两篇作品的特征和优劣长短，认为《西厢记》重“”而《广寒楼记》重“情”，故对后的评价更高。因此该评点虽然受金圣叹的影响，但主要是从自身的化、思想背景出发来展开独特的议论，在研究中、韩小说批评史时具有一定的参考价值。

A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Guanghanlouji''s (广寒楼记) Commentaries Made by So-um-zuyin with Those of the Commentaries Made by JIN Shen-tan on Xixiangji(西厢记)

From the end of sixteenth century plenty of Chinese colloquial fictions, together whith Pingdian, one way of making comments on the Chinese contemporary colloquial fictions, began to spread to Choseon, Korea. In China, JIN Shen-tan was the most influential commentator in doing Pingdian at that time. In Choseon, Korea, people were also influenced by this way of making comments on the fictions written in Chinese characters and So-um-zuyin was one of them. However, on closer examination, vital differences were found between what was done by JIN Shen-tan and what was done by So-um-zuyin. This paper compares the ways of commenting on Guanghanlouji, a fiction of the Ming Dynasty, by So-um-zuyin with the ways of commenting on Xixiangji, another fiction of the Ming Dynasty, by JIN Shen-tan. It aims to point out that So-un-zuyin mainly makes his comments a-gainst his cultural and philosophical backgrounds and that he should occupy a position in the history of novel criticism both in Korea and China.