首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《史记》整理平议
引用本文:王华宝. 《史记》整理平议[J]. 金陵法律评论, 2003, 0(5): 149-155
作者姓名:王华宝
作者单位:南京师范大学文学院,江苏,南京210097
摘    要:对古籍新整理本特别是公认的典范之作进行平议,将有助于进一步提高古籍整理出版的质量。中华书局校点本《史记》是人们学习和开展《史记》研究工作最常用的权威本,并被认为是古籍整理方面成绩优异的代表作之一。实际上,校点本仅正部分就新生字差错80余处,径自改移增删、脱漏校改符号等古籍整理失范之处不少,吸收学术成果不足,漏校、误校问题亦多。随着当代学术研究的深入,对《史记》有重加整理的必要。

关 键 词:古籍整理  <史记>校点本  平议
文章编号:1001-4608(2003)05-0149-07
修稿时间:2002-12-23

A Discussion of the Revision of Historical Records
WANG Hua-bao. A Discussion of the Revision of Historical Records[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2003, 0(5): 149-155
Authors:WANG Hua-bao
Abstract:A discussion of the revision of the classics , especially those known to all, will help to enhance their quality. The revised version published by Zhonghua Publishing House is both most popularly used and authoritative text on the study of Historical Records and is praised as one of the masterpieces in the revision of ancient works. However, there are over 80 errors which relate to characters in this revised version, and many other mistakes including the ignorance of new academic achievements, the omission and mistakes of revision. So it is of urgency for us to make further revision of Historical Records.
Keywords:revision of the classics  Historical Records  revised version  discussion  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号