狭义牵连关系界定标准之提倡简

司法实践中牵连关系与吸收关系始终纠缠不清，因为手段与目的、原因与结果之间的牵连关系，很可能就是前一行为是后一行为的必经阶段，后一行为是前一行为的自然结果之间的吸收关系，反之亦然。而对牵连犯，有的按一罪处理，有的按数罪处理，也给司法适用造成了困难。导致这种结局的原因在于，传统刑法牵连关系理论采用的是广义型牵连关系。解决牵连关系混乱的出路是对牵连关系做限制解释，坚持不可逾越与避免、严格参照罪状、经验法则等原则。

The Definition Standard of Narrow Implicated Relation

In judicial practice, it is hard to clearly distinguish implicated relation from absorbable relation. For implicated relation always exists between criminal means and intent, or between criminal causes and results, this often easily develops into an absorbable relation that the previous action is the inevitable stage of the following ac- tion, or the following action is the natural result of the previous action. As for implicated offence, it has been a di- lemma whether to punish it as one crime or plural crime in judicial practice. The reason is that traditional criminal law theory adopted a broad idea over implicated relation. Therefore, the way to define implicated relation is to re- strict the interpretation and maintain some corresponding principles.