关于“民间反扒组织”合法性的探讨

扒窃活动具有犯罪与一般违法的双重性质,因而反扒活动亦相应具有侦查性质与治安查处性质;公安机关是反扒活动唯一法定主体;民间组织反扒活动不具有合法性,群众组织只能在公安机关组织指挥下协助反扒;现行"民间反扒组织"必须更名和调整活动范围.

A Discussion on Validity of "Nongovernmental Anti-pickpocket Organizations"

Pickpockets' activities have dual properties: criminal property and generally illegal property. Therefore, activities of anti-pickpocket correspondingly have natures of investigation as well as public order examining; Public security organ is the sole legal body in activities of anti-pickpocket, while activities of nongovernmental anti-pickpocket organizations have no validity because the organizations of the masses can only play an assisting role in the activities of anti-pickpocket under the commands of public security organs. The paper discusses the necessity to change the name of current " nongovernmental anti-pickpocket organizations " and adjust their scope of activities.