首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论职务犯罪初查的归位
引用本文:李超,胡绍宝. 论职务犯罪初查的归位[J]. 山西警官高等专科学校学报, 2008, 16(1): 51-55
作者姓名:李超  胡绍宝
作者单位:上海市普陀区人民检察院,上海,200333
摘    要:检察机关将职务犯罪“主观立案条件”错解为“客观立案条件”,为满足“客观立案条件”的要求,最高人民检察院将职务犯罪初查定位为立案前的审查和调查,这实际上属于越权立法;而初查中有局限性的调查手段,导致变相地放纵了职务犯罪。职务犯罪初查的本质是侦查,是初步侦查,有必要于立案之后先开展初步侦查,待获取一定证据之后再开展正式侦查。

关 键 词:职务犯罪  立案条件  初步侦查
文章编号:1671-685X(2008)01-0051-05
修稿时间:2007-08-24

On the Adscription of Preliminary Investigation of Official Offence
LI Chao,HU Shao-bao. On the Adscription of Preliminary Investigation of Official Offence[J]. Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy, 2008, 16(1): 51-55
Authors:LI Chao  HU Shao-bao
Affiliation:LI Chao, HU Shao - bao (Shanghai Putuo People& Procuratorate , Shanghai 200333, China)
Abstract:The procuratorate misunderstood"subjective elements" as "objective elements".In order to meet the demands of "objective elements",the Supreme People's Procuratorate identified the preliminary investigation of official offence as the investigation before case-filing.In fact,it is ultra vires legislation.However,the limited investigation methods in the preliminary investigation lead to more indulgent official offence.The nature of elementary investigation of official offence is investigation.Formal investigation should be carried out after elementary investigation and mastering certain evidence.
Keywords:official offence  elements of case-filing  preliminary investigation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号