首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

智能司法中的伦理问题及其应对
引用本文:罗洪洋,李相龙. 智能司法中的伦理问题及其应对[J]. 政法论丛, 2021, 0(1): 148-160
作者姓名:罗洪洋  李相龙
作者单位:中南财经政法大学法学院
基金项目:2020年国家社会科学基金项目“贵州少数民族聚居地方习惯法司法适用研究”(20XMZ032)的阶段性研究成果。
摘    要:人工智能使用于司法涉及到突出的伦理问题,智能司法与司法伦理既有紧密关系又有紧张关系.司法公正的一个很重要因素是证据的获取,证据的获取与知识智慧有很大的关联性,人工智能使用于司法在证据获取等方面具有相对于人工的以下优势:准确性、重复性、快速性、抉择性、无私性.智能司法与司法伦理的紧张关系是指智能司法可能损害司法公正:算法...

关 键 词:智能司法  司法伦理  法官主导  规制算法歧视

Ethical Problems in Intelligent Justice and Their Solutions
Luo Hongyang,Li Xianglong. Ethical Problems in Intelligent Justice and Their Solutions[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2021, 0(1): 148-160
Authors:Luo Hongyang  Li Xianglong
Affiliation:(Law School of Zhongnan University of Finance and law,Wuhan Hubei 430073)
Abstract:The use of artificial intelligence in justice involves prominent ethical issues.Intelligent justice and judicial ethics are closely related and tense.The close relationship between intelligent justice and judicial ethics refers to the realization of judicial justice by intelligent justice.A very important factor of judicial justice is the acquisition of evidence which has great relevance to knowledge and wisdom.when artificial intelligence used in judicial,in terms of evidence acquisition,it has the following advantages over manual labor:accuracy,repeatability,speed,choice,and selflessness.The tension between smart justice and judicial ethics means that smart justice may do harm to judicial justice as following:the impact of algorithmic discrimination on judicial ethics,the changes of the nature of judicial justice and the dominant position of judges,the errors of big data and robots,and artificial intelligence itself has no value judgment.It is necessary to take precautions for the malignant risks of judicial ethics under the tensions and make plans:recognize the absence of the ethical in artificial intelligence justice,strengthen ethical review;control expectations of artificial intelligence justice,strengthen the dominant position of judges in the judicial system;regulate the algorithmic discrimination to protect the personality rights of the parties.
Keywords:intelligent justice  judicial ethics  judge-led  regulate the algorithmic discrimination
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号