首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

检察机关审查排除非法证据问题探讨
引用本文:胡忠惠. 检察机关审查排除非法证据问题探讨[J]. 北方法学, 2013, 0(2): 103-110
作者姓名:胡忠惠
作者单位:山东工商学院政法学院
基金项目:2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“刑事瑕疵证据的实证研究与理论阐释”(项目编号11YJA820028);山东省人民检察院2011年重点研究项目“检察机关审查排除非法证据问题研究”(项目编号2011JCKT009)的阶段成果
摘    要:我国检察机关依法享有排除非法证据的职能,能够发挥检察官的自由裁量权,加强对侦查主体行使权力的监督;满足检察机关与法院互相配合特殊关系的需要;确保检察机关恪守客观公正的立场,校正辩方弱势的不平衡。通过实证观察,检察机关排除非法证据的实际运作并不乐观,存在非法证据界定不明、缺乏审查排除程序规则等问题。有必要正确界定非法证据,明确非法证据的排除原则;设置对抗性的听证程序,构建包括启动、审查、处理、救济环节的检察机关审查排除非法证据机制。

关 键 词:裁量权  监督权  非法证据  排除规则  审查机制

Exclusion of Illegal Evidence upon Examination by the Procuratorial Organ
HU Zhong-hui. Exclusion of Illegal Evidence upon Examination by the Procuratorial Organ[J]. Northern Legal Science, 2013, 0(2): 103-110
Authors:HU Zhong-hui
Affiliation:HU Zhong-hui
Abstract:China's procuratorial organs perform the function of excluding illegal evidence according to law.Such function can guarantee the prosecutor to exercise the judicial discretion and strengthen the supervision on investigation organs.Besides,it can meet the coordination needs of the special relationship of the procuratorial organ and the court;ensure the procuratorial organs an objective and justified stance so as to rectify the imbalance of the defense in less advantageous position.However,based on empirical study,the function of procuratorial organs to exclude illegal evidence is not optimistically performed,e.g.,the illegal evidence is not defined clearly and the examination procedures for exclusion are absent.Thus,it is necessary to explicitly define the illegal evidence;to formulate examination doctrine for exclusion of illegal evidence;to set up adversarial hearing procedure;and to establish integrated mechanism for procuratorial organs to exclude illegal evidence including initiation,examination,resolution and remedies.
Keywords:judicial discretion supervision illegal evidence exclusion rule examination mechanism
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号