首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

“携带凶器抢夺”适用的思考——刑法第267条第2款释疑
引用本文:林少东,卢玉琼. “携带凶器抢夺”适用的思考——刑法第267条第2款释疑[J]. 福建公安高等专科学校学报, 2003, 17(2): 93-95
作者姓名:林少东  卢玉琼
作者单位:福建师范大学经济法律学院,福建,福州,350007
摘    要:最高人民法院《关于审理抢劫案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第6条对“携带凶器抢夺”的两种情形明确界定为抢劫罪。但是在司法实践中对“携带凶器抢夺”的适用存在困难和分歧;因此应正确对“携带凶器抢夺”予以定性,并正确适用其构成抢夺罪、抢劫罪、转化型抢劫罪的情形。

关 键 词:携带凶器抢夺  抢劫罪  转化型抢劫罪
文章编号:1008-6048(2003)02-0093-03
修稿时间:2002-05-31

Consideration on Applying laws to "Snatching with Weapon"--Explanation to the 2nd Clause of No.267 Criminal law
LIN Shao-dong,LU Yu-qiong. Consideration on Applying laws to "Snatching with Weapon"--Explanation to the 2nd Clause of No.267 Criminal law[J]. The Study of Social Public Security, 2003, 17(2): 93-95
Authors:LIN Shao-dong  LU Yu-qiong
Abstract:In the entry of“interpretations of several problems in concretely using law to judge robbery cases”issued by the Supreme People's Court,the sixth article clearly defines two kinds of snatching with lethal weapon actions as crime of pillage.However,in the judicial practice,there are some difficulties and disputes in applying laws and regulations to snatching with weapon actions,so we must accurately deter-mine the nature of them,exactly apply proper laws to the circumstances of snatching offense,crime of pil-lage and converted crime of pillage.
Keywords:snatching with lethal weapon  crime of pillage  converted crime of pillage  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号