首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论贩卖毒品罪认定的三个争议问题——以真实案例为研究素材
引用本文:吴情树. 论贩卖毒品罪认定的三个争议问题——以真实案例为研究素材[J]. 福建警察学院学报, 2016, 0(1): 10-18
作者姓名:吴情树
作者单位:华侨大学法学院,福建 泉州,362021
基金项目:2013年度华侨大学第一期科研启动费资助项目
摘    要:贩卖毒品严重威胁和危害了公众健康,是毒品犯罪中最为严重的一种犯罪。贩卖毒品罪是一种抽象危险犯,其侵犯的法益是公众的健康,因此必须根据贩卖毒品罪所侵害的法益来对"贩卖"进行实质性的解释。在吸毒人员贩卖毒品数量的认定上,应该结合案件的具体情况,根据2000年《南宁会议纪要》、2008年《大连会议纪要》以及2015年《武汉会议纪要》的规定进行判断和计算。"毒贩子"协助警察诱惑其他毒品犯罪分子出卖毒品,并在控制交付下抓获其他"毒贩子"的,应该认定为立功,但如果其立功线索系其家属通过不当手段所提供的,则不能认定为立功。

关 键 词:贩卖毒品  诱惑侦查  数量认定

On the Three Contentious Issues of Drug Trafficking Conviction---Based on the Real Cases
Abstract:Drug trafficking, which seriously exposes threat and harm to public health, is the most serious one of drug -related crimes. Drug trafficking is an abstract and dangerous offense and violates the public health. Therefore, the word "trafficking" must be substantially interpreted in accordance with the legal interest the crime will damage. The quantity of drugs involved in drug trafficking should be judged and calculated on the basic of the actual circumstances in each case according to the regulations of "Nanning Meeting Minutes" in 2000 , "Dalian Meeting Minutes" in 2008 and"Wuhan Meeting Minutes" in 2015 . "Drug dealer" should be confirmed as merito-rious service if he assists the police to lure other drug criminals to sell drugs and to capture the criminals under the controlled delivery. But if the meritorious service clues are provided by his relatives through improper means, he will definitely not be qualified for meritorious service.
Keywords:drug trafficking  investigation through temptation  quantity cognizance
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号