首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Proactive Policing: a Summary of the Report of the National Academies of Sciences,Engineering, and Medicine
Authors:Weisburd  David  Majmundar  Malay K.  Aden  Hassan  Braga  Anthony  Bueermann  Jim  Cook  Philip J.  Goff  Phillip Atiba  Harmon   Rachel A.  Haviland  Amelia  Lum  Cynthia  Manski  Charles  Mastrofski  Stephen  Meares  Tracey  Nagin  Daniel  Owens  Emily  Raphael  Steven  Ratcliffe  Jerry  Tyler  Tom
Affiliation:1.George Mason University, Fairfax, USA
;2.Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
;3.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, USA
;4.The Aden Group, Omaha, USA
;5.Northeastern University, Boston, USA
;6.Police Foundation, Washington, USA
;7.Duke University, Durham, USA
;8.Center for Policing Equity, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York City, USA
;9.University of Virginia Law School, Charlottesville, USA
;10.Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
;11.Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
;12.Yale Law School, New Haven, USA
;13.University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA
;14.University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
;15.Temple University, Philadelphia, USA
;
Abstract:

This paper provides a summary of our report for the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine on proactive policing. We find that there is sufficient scientific evidence to support the adoption of many proactive policing practices if the primary goal is to reduce crime, though the evidence base generally does not provide long-term or jurisdictional estimates. In turn, we conclude that crime prevention outcomes can often be obtained without producing negative community reactions. However, the most effective proactive policing strategies do not appear to have strong positive impacts on citizen perceptions of the police. At the same time, some community-based strategies have begun to show evidence of improving the relations between the police and public. We conclude that there are likely to be large racial disparities in the volume and nature of police–citizen encounters when police target high-risk people or high-risk places, as is common in many proactive policing programs. We could not conclude whether such disparities are due to statistical prediction, racial animus, implicit bias, or other causes.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号