| 论我国刑事证明模式的选择 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吕庆华,史俊峰. 论我国刑事证明模式的选择[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2010, 23(2): 53-57 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吕庆华 史俊峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学法学院,山东,济南,250100;山东大学法学院,山东,济南,250100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对法定证明与自由证明两种模式的阐述,结合当前我国证据立法方面的实际情况,对比法定证明与自由证明的各自优势,从我国依法治国方略、证据法律规定及法官整体水平看,我国的证据立法应当走法定证明与自由证明相结合的道路。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事证明 法定证明 自由证明 |
On Option of Criminal Certification Mode in China |
| |
| Lv Qinghua,Shi Junfeng. On Option of Criminal Certification Mode in China[J]. JOurnal of Hubei University of Police, 2010, 23(2): 53-57 |
| |
| Authors: | Lv Qinghua Shi Junfeng |
| |
| Affiliation: | Shandong University;Jinan 250100;China |
| |
| Abstract: | This article described two modes of regulated proof and free proof, combined with the practice of evidence legislation in our country, compared their advantages and disadvantages, and then come to a conclusion that our evidence legislation should contain regulated proof and free proof together based on the strategy of managing a country by law, legal rules of evidences and integrity level of judges. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal certification regulated proof free proof |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
