| 略论法定刑的制约性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 安文霞. 略论法定刑的制约性[J]. 山东行政学院学报, 2008, 0(2): 65-67 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 安文霞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学,北京,100088 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法定刑本身属性决定了刑事立法应该接受其内在精神的制约,做到同害同罚,异害异罚,不同犯罪法定刑应该达到平衡,法定刑的设置应该为司法适度解释提供保障,另外不能超越法定刑本身作出司法解释,其具体包括以下内容：最高司法机关作出的司法解释应该受到法定刑的制约;司法机关在运用刑事法律的时候,对于法律条文的理解也必须接受法定刑的制约。司法适用中对想象竞合犯罪、转化犯罪的认定也应该接受法定刑的制约。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法定刑 制约 刑事立法 司法解释 犯罪认定 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-3154(2008)02-0065-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2008-02-18 |
Comment on restraint of legal punishment |
| |
| AN Wen-xia. Comment on restraint of legal punishment[J]. Journal of Shandong Administrative College and Shandong Economic Management Personnel College, 2008, 0(2): 65-67 |
| |
| Authors: | AN Wen-xia |
| |
| Affiliation: | AN Wen - xia (China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing , 100088 ,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Criminal legislation ought to accept its inherent vigorous restraint to reach the goal of equal punishment because of attribute of legal punishment. Legal punishment ought to reach balance among different crime. Interposition of legal punishment ought to make a moderate interpretation for judiciary providing a guarantee and can not exceed legal punishment to make a judiciary interpretation. It includes the following content concretely ： The judiciary that maximal judicial authority makes explains ought to be accepted restraint of legal punishment; When judicial authority apples criminal law, they also must accept legal punishment restraint understanding of law article. The firm of jointly imaginary committing a crime, involving committing a crime , changing committing a crime also ought to be restrained by legal punishment in judiciary. |
| |
| Keywords: | Legal Punishment Restraint Criminal Legislation Judiciary Interpretation Sentence of Crime |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
