| 论中国古代的"个人"话语及其本质 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高玉. 论中国古代的"个人"话语及其本质[J]. 思想战线, 2004, 30(5): 99-102 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高玉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江师范大学,人文学院,浙江,金华,321004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国古代只有"民"的概念而没有"人"的概念,"民"作为概念和范畴其意义是在和"君"以及"社稷"的相互关系中确定的。人在中国古代始终是第二位的。中国古代的"爱民"与"重民"始终是手段而不是目的本身。中国古代的"民本主义"不是个人主义,也不是"群体主义",本质上是"君主主义"。中国古代的个人观念与西方的个人观念不是相近而是相反。
|
| 关 键 词： | " 人" ," 民" ," 己" ," 君" ,个人主义," 社稷" ,国家 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-778X(2004)05-099-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-05-11 |
The Individual Discourse and Its Nature in Ancient China |
| |
| GAO Yu. The Individual Discourse and Its Nature in Ancient China[J]. The Ideological Front(Yunnan University's Journal of Social Sciences), 2004, 30(5): 99-102 |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Yu |
| |
| Abstract: | In ancient China, there was only the concept of "citizen"but not the concept of "human". The concept and connotation of "citizen"were determined in regarding to its relationship with the "emperor"and"state and society". In ancient China, human was secondary in that "loving people"and "emphasizing on people"was just a means but not the end. "People-centeredness"was neither "individualism"nor "collectivism,"but "monarchism"in nature. The ancient Chinese concept of individual was just theopposite to that in Western countries. |
| |
| Keywords: | " human" ," citizen" ," self" ," emperor" ,individualism," state and society" ,country, |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
