Post-release controls for sex offenders in the U.S. and UK |
| |
Authors: | Lieb Roxanne Kemshall Hazel Thomas Terry |
| |
Affiliation: | a Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, Washington, United Statesb DeMontford University, Leicester, United Kingdomc School of Social Sciences, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | In recent years, both the United States and United Kingdom have developed numerous innovations in legal efforts to protect society from sex offenders. Each country has adopted special provisions for sex offenders. In particular, governments have focused on forms of social control after release from incarceration and probation. These policy innovations for this category of offenders have been more far reaching than those for any other offender population. The two jurisdictions have adopted policies with similar goals, but the selected strategies have important differences. Generally speaking, the U.S. has favored an ever-expanding set of policies that place sex offenders into broad categories, with few opportunities that distinguish the appropriate responses for individual offenders. The UK government observed the proliferation of Megan's Laws1 in the U.S., and deliberately chose to establish carefully controlled releases of information, primarily relying on governmental agencies to work in multi-disciplinary groups and make case-specific decisions about individual offenders. Although the UK policy leaders expressed significant concern that the public's response to knowing about identified sex offenders living in the community would result in vigilantism, to date the results have not borne out this fear. Both governments have turned to other crime control measures such as polygraphy testing, electronic monitoring, and civil protection orders as a means to prevent further sexual violence. |
| |
Keywords: | Megan's Law Sex offender policy Registration and notification laws |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|