首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

新刑诉下公诉工作司法能动性之发挥
引用本文:宋盈,郭旭. 新刑诉下公诉工作司法能动性之发挥[J]. 四川警官高等专科学校学报, 2014, 0(2): 57-63
作者姓名:宋盈  郭旭
作者单位:[1]天津市滨海新区塘沽人民检察院,天津300450 [2]中国政法大学,北京100088
摘    要:在我国,能动司法与西方有所差别,其主要强调司法机关如何将法、情、理有机融合,慎重平衡各方主体利益。能动司法有利于化解社会矛盾,实现司法公正,同时也是对恢复性司法理念的回应。刑事和解、附条件不起诉、量刑建议,均为公诉工作发挥司法能动性提供了有效平台。同时,在公诉工作发挥司法能动性时,也存在办案检察官角色定位偏差等问题。要使公诉工作司法能动性得以有效发挥,上述问题亟待完善。

关 键 词:司法能动  刑事和解  附条件不起诉  量刑建议

Judicial Activism of Prosecution under the new Criminal Procedure Law
SONG Ying,GUO Xu. Judicial Activism of Prosecution under the new Criminal Procedure Law[J]. , 2014, 0(2): 57-63
Authors:SONG Ying  GUO Xu
Abstract:In China, judicial acti vism varies with the West, it focuses on how the judiciary carefully balances the main interests of law and society. Judicial activism is conducive to resolve social conflicts, to achieve justice, it is also a response to the concept of restorative justice .Reconciliation, conditional non-prosecution and sentencing recommendations, are effective platforms for judicial activism. But there are also some problems such as the error role of the prosecutor and so on. To make the work of judicial activism indictment to effectively play, the above issues need to be perfect.
Keywords:Judicial Activism  Criminal Reconciliation  Conditional Non -prosecution  Sentencing Recommendations
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号