行政证据刑事司法化--兼论《刑事诉讼法》第52条的理解与适用

2012《刑事诉讼法》对行政证据在刑事诉讼中作为证据使用予以认可,从理论维度对传统的证据转换说予以否定,行政证据刑事司法化应运而生。较证据转换说而言,行政证据刑事司法化更符合立法原意,体现刑事法律的体系化,遵循尊重和保障人权以及诉讼效率的价值,对立法完善起着导向作用。有效衔接行政证据与刑事证据,离不开司法人员合法、正当司法：明确行政证据在刑事司法程序中的重要性以及所扮演的关键角色,树立尊重和保障人权的理念。

On Criminal Judicialization of the Administrative Evidence

The 2012 criminal procedure law determines that the administrative evidence can be used as evidence in criminal lawsuit, negating the traditional evidence conversion in theory. The criminal judicialization of the administrative evidence arose. To the evidence conversion, the criminal judicialization of the administrative evidence is more consistent with the legislative intention, manifests the systematization of criminal law, respects and guarantees human rights and the value of lawsuit efficiency and plays a guiding role to improve the lawmaking. The effective connection of the administrative evidence and the criminal evidence cannot separate the judiciary and the justice, that’s to say, we must understand well the importance of the administrative evidence in the process of the criminal judicial procedure and its key role, build up ideas to respect and safeguard human rights.