首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

美国《1930年关税法》修改的法律观察
引用本文:刘瑛. 美国《1930年关税法》修改的法律观察[J]. 北方法学, 2013, 7(1): 89-93
作者姓名:刘瑛
作者单位:武汉大学WTO学院
基金项目:教育部社会科学基金青年项目"国际货物买卖损害赔偿制度实证研究",武汉大学"70后"学者学术发展计划项目"可持续发展战略下的环境法治"以及中国法学会2012年青年项目"中国稀土贸易管理制度法律研究"[项目编号CLS(2012)C80]的研究成果
摘    要:美国近日修改《1930年关税法》授权美国商务部对以中国为代表的所谓"非市场经济国家"征收反补贴税,是对来自中国的进口产品新一轮贸易保护主义的表现。WTO规则并未禁止对"非市场经济国家"反补贴,因此美国此次修法并不违反其在WTO项下的义务,但美国如果对来自中国的产品按照"非市场经济国家"使用替代国方法进行"双反"救济,依据WTO争端解决上诉机构"对来自中国的产品的反补贴和反倾销措施"报告,将很可能违反WTO协定的"适当金额"要求,构成双重救济。中国当前最重要的是积极应对现实的"双反"调查,而长远的目标则是争取美国对中国完全市场经济地位的承认。

关 键 词:关税法修订案  非市场经济国家  WTO  “双反”  双重救济

Legal Review on the U.S. Amendment to Tariff Act of 1930
LIU Ying. Legal Review on the U.S. Amendment to Tariff Act of 1930[J]. Northern Legal Science, 2013, 7(1): 89-93
Authors:LIU Ying
Abstract:U.S. has recently amended the Tariff Act of 1930, which authorizes U.S. Ministry of Com- merce to impose countervailing duty on "non - market economy states" including China. It is obviously new - round trade protectionism against Chinese importation. Under WTO rules the countervailing measures against "non -market economy state" are not prohibited, so this amendment is not in violation of WTO obligations. Nevertheless, if U.S. treats China as "non - market economy state" and resorts to double remedies of anti - dumping and countervailing duties by means of surrogate approach, U.S. may violate the "appropriate a- mount" requirement and constitute double remedies in accordance with the Report of Appellate Body of DSB on United States -Definitive Anti -dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China. Therefore, it is of vital importance for China to positively respond and defend the anti - dumping and counter- vailing investigation and to gain recognition of full market economy status from U.S. in the long run.
Keywords:Amendment to Tariff Act of 1930 non - market economy state WTO anti - dumping and countervailing double remedies
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号