首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

非法实物证据的排除模式:利益权衡与客观化基准
引用本文:林喜芬.非法实物证据的排除模式:利益权衡与客观化基准[J].犯罪研究,2009(1):60-67.
作者姓名:林喜芬
作者单位:四川大学法学院
摘    要:在刑事诉讼领域,“利益权衡”是平衡人权保障和犯罪控制两大理念的重要法律方法。针对非法实物证据的排除,利益权衡的法律方法在比较法上发挥着重要制度机能,美国实行的是实践意义的利益权衡、德国等实行的是规范意义的利益权衡、新西兰实行的是转型意义的利益权衡。但作为一种主观性较强的方法论,它也存在制度局限与客观化诉求。因此,我国在实物证据的排除领域引进利益权衡方法时,也应设定相应的客观化基准。

关 键 词:非法实物证据  排除模式  利益权衡  客观化基准

How to Exclude the Unlawful Physical Evidence:Cost-benefit Analysis and Objective Norm
LIN Xifen.How to Exclude the Unlawful Physical Evidence:Cost-benefit Analysis and Objective Norm[J].Criminal Research,2009(1):60-67.
Authors:LIN Xifen
Abstract:Cost-benefit analysis is an important legal method to balance due process and crime control, especially in field of exclusionary rule. Cost-benefit analysis in America is practical, in Germany is normative, and in New Zealand is transitional. Still, as a rather subjective method, it has some institutional defects and need to be objective. Accordingly, we should introduce cost-benefit analysis into China with setting up a series of objective norms.
Keywords:unlawful physical evidence  exclusion pattern  cost-benefit analysis  objective norm
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号