首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

驳泛叙述者论
引用本文:蒂尔曼·科佩,扬·施图林. 驳泛叙述者论[J]. 浙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2011, 1(6): 15-29
作者姓名:蒂尔曼·科佩  扬·施图林
作者单位:德国哥廷根大学
摘    要:很多当代叙事学家都认为所有的虚构叙事都有一个不同于作者的虚构叙述者。这一观点被称为“泛叙述者论”。本文以充分的理由驳斥了这一观点,同时指出那些看似支持这一观点的重要论据是根本站不住脚的。在简要介绍小说理论的基础上,文章认为,无论从理论还是从实践角度来说,都没有必要为每个虚构叙事假定一个虚构叙述者。

关 键 词:泛叙述者论  虚构叙事  叙事学  
收稿时间:2011-11-25

Against Pan-narrator Theories
Tilmann Koppe,Jan Stuhring. Against Pan-narrator Theories[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2011, 1(6): 15-29
Authors:Tilmann Koppe  Jan Stuhring
Affiliation:Tilmann Koppe,Jan Stühring(University of Goettingen,Goettingen 37073,Germany)
Abstract:Most narratologists today maintain that all fictional narratives have a fictional narrator that is to be distinguished from its author. Call this a “pan-narrator theory” (PN). In this essay, we argue that there are good reasons against this position, while important arguments that seem to speak in favor of it can be shown to be ultimately untenable. We start by offering a brief sketch of a theory of fiction that serves as the basis of our considerations and then defend the view that there is no need, theoretical or pragmatic, to postulate a fictional narrator for every fictional narrative.
Keywords:pan-narrator theories  fictional narrative  narratology
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号