论我国非法证据排除程序的完善

非法证据排除程序作为一项国际通行的程序，具有保障人权、实现实体正义的价值。我国非法证据排除程序尚存在辨方承担启动程序的初步举证责任不够合理、法庭启动调查程序的标准过于笼统和抽象、公诉人证明取证手段合法性缺乏公信力、调查程序缺乏法庭裁决、证据能力与证明力混淆、缺乏救济程序等诸多缺陷，应当适当降低程序启动证明标准、细化启动规则、规范侦控方的证明方法、规定当庭裁定、建立救济制度，以进一步完善我国的非法证据排除程序。

On the Perfection of the Exclusive Procedure of Illegal Evidence in China

The exclusive procedure of Illegal evidence as an international popular procedure has values to safeguard human rights, to realize the substantive justice. But there are still many drawbacks in the exclusive rule of illegal evidence in China; for example, defender should bear the initial burden of proof which is unreasonable, the criterion for a court to start an investigation is too general and abstract, the prosecutors’ the ways of obtaining evidence and testimony mean lack of credibility, survey procedures lack court ruling and there are confusion between evidence ability and the proof strength, lack of relief procedure. In order to improve exclusive procedure of illegal evidence, we should appropriately reduced proof standard of starting program, refine starting rule, standard methods of proof of the prosecutor, and establish court ruling, relief system.