论不纯正不作为犯的等价性

以不作为方式实施的不纯正不作为犯与以作为方式实施的作为犯,二者在存在结构和规范结构上各不相同,但在价值结构上,二者满足同一犯罪构成,共用同一犯罪构成要件,适用同一罪名和法定刑。此即不纯正不作为犯的等价性问题。为使不作为犯与作为犯等价性判断更具有可操作性,应当以具体犯罪的四个构成要件为标准进行认定,即从客观和主观两方面来综合判定不纯正不作为犯的等价性。

Issues Concerning the Equal Value of Non-Typical Omission Offence

Crimes of non-typical omission and crimes of commission are different in existing and regulated structures.In value structure,however,both of them satisfy the same constituent elements of crime,employ the same contributive elements and apply the same crime name and statutory sentence.That is the equal value problem of non-typical omission offence.To make the equal value judgment of omission and commission crimes more operationable,we should make recognition according to four contributive elements of a specific crime.That is,we should determine the equal value of non-typical omission offence objectively and subjectively.