| 知情权属性之学理研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何生根. 知情权属性之学理研究[J]. 法律科学, 2005, 23(5): 11-20 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何生根 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学法学教育研究与评估中心 北京102249 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 知情权的提出缘自对人性的不信任以及对权力监督和防御的需要;人民主权学说是知情权的政治思想基础;利益说和主张权利说是知情权的具体理论依据。作为观念中的权利,知情权具有可请求和可主张的积极权利属性;知情权义务主体的特殊性,使知情权具有不可避免的妥协性;知情权不仅能促进民主制度的发展,而且需要民主制度的支持,因此又具有民主权利属性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 知情权 积极权利 妥协性权利 民主权利 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-6914(2005)05-0011-(10) |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-07 |
An Academic Study on the Right to Know |
| |
| He Shenggen. An Academic Study on the Right to Know[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2005, 23(5): 11-20 |
| |
| Authors: | He Shenggen |
| |
| Affiliation: | HE Shenggen |
| |
| Abstract: | The reason to put forward the right to know is the distrust to human nature and demand to supervise and resist the power. The doctrine on Popular Sovereignty is the political and idealistic foundation for right to know. Doctrine of interests and doctrine for claiming right are the material academic basis to right to know. Right to know has the positive right property that can be asked and advocated. Because of the particularity of subject of obligation, right to know has an unavoidable tendency toward compromise. Right to know not only promote the development,but demand the support of democratic system, therefore, it has democratic right property. |
| |
| Keywords: | right to know positive right right that its tendency toward compromise democratic right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
