首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

刑事主观事实的证明问题初探
引用本文:孙道萃,黄帅燕. 刑事主观事实的证明问题初探[J]. 证据科学, 2011, 19(5): 539-547
作者姓名:孙道萃  黄帅燕
作者单位:北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院
摘    要:刑事主观事实的证明是一个世界性难题,仅靠口供等直接证据证明往往不够。间接证据证明和刑事推定是目前通行的两种有效方法,但我国的刑事立法和司法解释没有明确区分二者。间接证据体系的证明标准过高和间接证据不能单独直接证明主要案件事实共同导致间接证据证明的适用范围很有限.相应地可考虑降低证明标准和改变传统做法。刑事推定是另一种重...

关 键 词:刑事主观事实  间接证据证明  刑事推定  完善

Probe on the Proving of Criminal Subjective Facts
Sun Daocui,Huang Shuaiyan. Probe on the Proving of Criminal Subjective Facts[J]. Evidence Science, 2011, 19(5): 539-547
Authors:Sun Daocui  Huang Shuaiyan
Affiliation:.College for Criminal Law Science of Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875
Abstract:To prove the criminal subjective facts is a worldwide problem, using the direct evidence to prove is simply not enough. While using the indirect evidence and criminal presumption are the two prevailing and effective methods. However, at present, criminal legislation and judicial interpretation do not distinguish these two methods. As a matter of fact that the proof standard of indirect evidence is too high and that the main facts of a case can not be proved by indirect evidence lead to a limited application scope for the indirect evidence, there- fore these two aspects should be reformed accordingly. Criminal presumption is another important method, and it can be improved from the aspects of criminal legislation, proof burden, proof standard and rebuttal procedure.
Keywords:Criminal subjective facts  Indirect evidence to prove  Criminal presumption  Perfection
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号