首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论单位犯罪刑事责任的理念误区及其修正
引用本文:左坚卫,李会彬.论单位犯罪刑事责任的理念误区及其修正[J].山东警察学院学报,2013(5):29-35.
作者姓名:左坚卫  李会彬
作者单位:[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875 [2]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
基金项目:本文系2010年度国家社科基金重点项目“犯罪构成论体系比较研究”(项目批准号:IOAFX007)和2012年“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助”(supposedby“the Fundamental ResearchFundsfortheCentrMUniversities”)重点项目“风险社会视野下的刑法修改宏观问题研究”(项目编号:2012WZDl1)的阶段性成果.
摘    要:当前我国刑法理论对于单位犯罪刑事责任的构建仍然受限于自然人刑事责任的理论。实际上,以适用于自然人犯罪的处罚原则来处罚单位犯罪,并不能满足司法实践的需要。同时,以适用于自然人犯罪的处罚标准来衡量单位犯罪所处刑罚的合理性,其结论必然是司法实践的实际需要与理论应然状态的完全脱节。要走出这一误区,就应修正我国单位犯罪的刑事责任理念,基于单位犯罪自身的特殊性来构建我国单位犯罪的刑事责任体系。

关 键 词:单位犯罪  自然人犯罪  理念误区  修正

On Concept Misunderstanding of Criminal Responsibility in Crimes Commited by Unit and Its Amendment
Institution:ZUO Jian - wei, LI Hui - bin (School of Law, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875 Research Institute of Criminal Law Science, Beijing, 100875)
Abstract:At present, the criminal responsibility of unit crimes determined by criminal theory in China is still restricted by the theory of criminal responsibility of natural person. In fact, the punishment principle applicable to crimes by natural person is used to punish unit crime, which can not meet the needs of judicial practice. Meanwhile, if the punishment criteria applicable to crime by natural person are used to measure whether the criminal punishment imposed on unit crime is rational, the inevitable conclusion is that the actural needs of judicial practice will be completely divorced from theoretical state. The concept of criminal responsibility of unit crime should be rectified and criminal responsibility system of unit crime should be constructed based on the individual characteristics of unit crime in an effort to step out of misunderstanding.
Keywords:unit crime  crime by natural person  concept misunderstanding  rectify
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号