首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

以开放的姿态审视《鹿特丹规则》
引用本文:刘伟民. 以开放的姿态审视《鹿特丹规则》[J]. 中国海商法年刊, 2012, 0(1): 11-16
作者姓名:刘伟民
作者单位:中国民航管理干部学院社会科学系,北京,100102
摘    要:就《鹿特丹规则》,国内外的评估意见大相径庭。该规则的意义何在,前景如何,中国应持何种态度,是否应加入公约,成为问题的焦点。建议充分肯定公约的立法宗旨,积极评价公约的先进性,审时度势,谨慎处理加入公约的问题;借鉴国际经验,完善国内立法;海运企业加强培训,敢于竞争迎接挑战,抓住机遇发展壮大;"产、学、研"三结合,深入研究海商法的相关问题,积极参与国际立法活动,增强中国的话语权,努力为国际法学的发展做贡献。

关 键 词:《鹿特丹规则》  承运人责任制度  民事损害赔偿责任

Treating Rotterdam Rules with an open attitude
LIU Wei-min. Treating Rotterdam Rules with an open attitude[J]. Annual of China Maritime Law, 2012, 0(1): 11-16
Authors:LIU Wei-min
Affiliation:LIU Wei-min(Faculty of Social Sciences,Civil Aviation Management Institute of China,Beijing 100102,China)
Abstract:Assessment views of Rotterdam Rules are quite different.What is the significance and what are the prospects of the Convention? What attitude China should hold towards the Convention? Should China join the Convention? This article suggests that we should fully affirm the legislative purpose of Rotterdam Rules and give the advantages of the Convention a positive evaluation.As to the question whether China should join the Convention,we should consider the practical situation.Also,we should learn from international experience to improve domestic legislation and strengthen staff training to seize the opportunities and meet the challenges.Further,we should look in depth the issues of maritime law and take a more active role in international legislation activities so as to voice for China and contribute to the development of international law.
Keywords:Rotterdam Rules  liability of carrier  civil damages liability
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号