| 犯罪事实支配理论之适用范围 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 廖北海.犯罪事实支配理论之适用范围[J].北方法学,2011,5(5):72-78. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 廖北海 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川省高级人民法院研究室 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 犯罪事实支配是现实的支配,规范的犯罪事实支配不可取。犯罪事实支配并非确定正犯的唯一标准,其只能适用于支配犯,且其并非证成义务犯的要素之一。犯罪事实支配不包含特殊的客观构成要素,只有义务犯的概念能够以教义学上不矛盾而刑事政策上又恰当的方式解决无身份的故意工具问题。具有特殊的主观构成要件要素的情况完全处于犯罪事实支配理论的射程之内,但是在断绝的结果犯和短缩的二行为犯中,结论并不一样。
|
| 关 键 词： | 犯罪事实支配 无身份之故意工具 无目的之故意工具 |
On the Applicable Scope of Theories on Tatherrschaft |
| |
| LIAO Bei-hai.On the Applicable Scope of Theories on Tatherrschaft[J].Northern Legal Science,2011,5(5):72-78. |
| |
| Authors: | LIAO Bei-hai |
| |
| Institution: | LIAO Bei-hai |
| |
| Abstract: | Tatherrschaft（control of Corpus Delicti） refers to realistic control rather than normative control,that is,Taherrschaft cannot be accepted.Tatherrschaft is not the exclusive factor to determine the principal criminal but only applicable for dominant criminal,besides,it is not one of constitutive elements for proving obligatory criminal.Since Tatherrschaft doesn＇t contain special objective constitutive element,only the concept of obligatory criminal,which is consistent to dogmatic and proper in criminal policies,can solve the problem of intentional tools without status.As for special subjective constitutive elements,the scope of Tatherrschaftslehre is well applied,but the conclusion is different with different types of absichtsdelikte. |
| |
| Keywords: | Tatherrschaft intentional tools without status intentional tools without intent |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
