| 从律师刑事责任的承担看刑法第306条的存在合理性问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 袁剑湘.从律师刑事责任的承担看刑法第306条的存在合理性问题[J].湖北警官学院学报,2004,17(3):25-28. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 袁剑湘 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广州第一军医大学,政治部,广东,广州,510515 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑法第 30 6条规定的“辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭证据、伪造证据、妨害作证罪”主要涉及律师刑事责任问题 ,自其产生之日起即引起极大争议。本文以刑事立法科学性、合理性和明确性为视角 ,探讨了该条的立法缺失 ,对该条存在的合理性进行质疑 ,并从完善我国刑事立法以及树立正确刑事诉讼之理念的角度出发 ,提出废除刑法第 30 6条之立法建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 律师刑事责任 科学性原则 合理性原则 明确性原则 |
On the rationality of article 306 in criminal law |
| |
| YUAN Jian-xiang.On the rationality of article 306 in criminal law[J].JOurnal of Hubei University of Police,2004,17(3):25-28. |
| |
| Authors: | YUAN Jian-xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | The legislation of article 306 in criminal law of our country has aroused many disputes since it came into being. This article disobeys many legislative rules. Those rules include the rule of legislation in the scientific way, the rule of legislation in the rational way and the rule of legislation in the explicit way. To make our criminal law perfect, we suggest abolishing article 306. |
| |
| Keywords: | lawyer's criminal responsibility scientific principle rationalism explicit |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
