两大法系非法证据排除规则比较研究

排除非法证据是保障被告人人权,维护司法公正的一项重要原则。由于法律文化传统的不同以及特定时期控制犯罪与保护人权的需要,不同法系之间以及同一法系不同国家之间有关这一问题的诉讼理论和具体对策往往存在着许多差异。对两大法系非法证据排除规则的发展历史及有关法律规定进行了比较和研究,目的在于为确立我国的非法证据排除规则提供借鉴。

Comparative Study on Exclusionary Rules of Illegally Obtained Evidence in the Two Main Legal Systems

Exclusion of illegally obtained evidence is an important principle to protect human rights of the defendants and to guarantee judicial justice.Due to the different tradition of legal culture and the need to keep crimes in check and to protect human rights at different phase, there exist many differences in the exclusionary rules between different legal systems and different countries belonging to the same legal system.This paper makes a comparative study on the history of development of the exclusionary rules of illegally obtained evidence and related laws in order to help the establishment of the exclusionary rules of illegally obtained evidence in China.