首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

窝藏 转移 隐瞒毒品罪质疑
引用本文:杨向华,欧阳梓华. 窝藏 转移 隐瞒毒品罪质疑[J]. 云南警官学院学报, 2005, 0(1): 23-25
作者姓名:杨向华  欧阳梓华
作者单位:湖南公安高等专科学校,湖南,长沙,410138
摘    要:窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品、毒赃罪的犯罪对象毒品和毒赃是不同性质的两种物品,不宜规定在同一犯罪之中;窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品罪的规定违背了赃物犯罪发生的时间和共同犯罪论,不宜规定为赃物犯罪。刑法关于窝藏、转移、隐满毒品犯罪的规定刑设置也不甚合理,应取消刑法第3 49条关于窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品罪的规定,只保留窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒赃罪。

关 键 词:毒品犯罪  窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品罪  条文质疑  法条修改
文章编号:1672-6057(2005)01-23-03
修稿时间:2004-03-31

Queries on the Crime of Harboring, Transferring or Covering up Narcotics Drugs
YANG Xiang-hua,OUYANG Zi-hua. Queries on the Crime of Harboring, Transferring or Covering up Narcotics Drugs[J]. Yuannan Police Officer Academy, 2005, 0(1): 23-25
Authors:YANG Xiang-hua  OUYANG Zi-hua
Abstract:Narcotics drugs or pecuniary and other gains from criminal activities are two different things as criminal object. Therefore it is not proper to stipulate them in the same crime; moreover, the article on the crime of harboring, transferring or covering up narcotics drugs is not accordance with the gaining pecuniary time and joint crimes theory; the punishment on the crime is not reasonable either. So calling off the object of narcotics drugs and maintaining stipulation about pecuniary instead will be a better way.
Keywords:The crime of harboring   transferring or covering up narcotics drugs  queries on the article  amendment of articles  
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号