The Major Powers on Trial |
| |
Authors: | Dallaire, Romeo Manocha, Kishan Degnarain, Nishan |
| |
Affiliation: | * Romeo Dallaire, Force Commander of the United Nations Assistance Missions for Rwanda (UNAMIR), Fellow at the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Kishan Manocha, Psychiatrist and barrister (UK), Research Assistant, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; [kishan_manocha{at}yahoo.co.uk]. Nishan Degnarain, Master in Public Administration in International Development candidate (2006), Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Colonel Ken Watkin for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper. |
| |
Abstract: | Faced with incontrovertible evidence of the most clear-cut caseof genocide possible, the international community failed todenounce the evil and to take action to stop the killings takingplace in Rwanda in 1994. Under the influence of three majorpowersFrance, the United States and the United KingdomtheUnited Nations was disabled from taking the necessary actionbecause the mass slaughter of the Tutsi people did not impingeon these powers' narrowly defined national interests. In thespecific case of France, there is evidence to show that thispower arguably aided and abetted the genocide. Yet, in contrast,these three powers were able to take decisive and quick actionwhen faced with an outraged domestic public in response to thehumanitarian crisis which unfolded from the genocide. Thereare many reasons why individuals and governments cannot bringthemselves to use the word genocide. In the caseof Rwanda, perhaps the enormity of the concept prevented thosewho were in the midst of it from recognizing it for what itactually was. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|