| 中美司法精神病学鉴定制度比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张钦廷. 中美司法精神病学鉴定制度比较[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2007, 0(5): 46-49 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张钦廷 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所,上海,200063 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 拥有专门知识的人才进入司法程序,凭其专业知识对专门技术问题发表意见。这样的人在大陆法系被称为鉴定人,在英美法系则被称为专家证人,我国使用鉴定人称谓。本文从司法鉴定管理体制、司法鉴定人制度、司法鉴定启动制度及司法鉴定程序制度等方面对中美两国司法精神病学的司法鉴定制度进行比较。最后简要介绍两个特殊的问题:最终争论和结论质证。
|
| 关 键 词： | 司法精神病学 司法鉴定制度 最终争论 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-2072(2007)05-0046-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-06-26 |
Comparison of Forensic Psychiatry Systems between China and America |
| |
| ZHANG Qin-ting. Comparison of Forensic Psychiatry Systems between China and America[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2007, 0(5): 46-49 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Qin-ting |
| |
| Abstract: | People who apply professional knowledge and provide opinions on special issues in legal proceedings are called expert witnesses in Anglo-American law system,and assessors in continental law system.This paper discussed the differences of forensic psychiatry system between China and America in the aspects of the forensic administration system,forensic practitioner system,startup system and procedure system.Two special issues,i.e.ultimate issue and cross-examination of expert opinions,were also introduced. |
| |
| Keywords: | forensic psychiatry expertise system ultimate issue |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
