| “坦白从宽”刑事政策与辩诉交易制度比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭祥. “坦白从宽”刑事政策与辩诉交易制度比较研究[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2009, 22(6): 14-18 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 黄埔海关缉私局,广州510730 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 引进西方国家的辩诉交易制度,还是完善发展我国“坦白从宽”的刑事政策,是摆在理论界和司法实践面前的选择性命题。通过对两者的比较,得出这样的结论：移植“辩诉交易”不可行,“坦白从宽”法制化是当然选择。
|
| 关 键 词： | 坦白从宽 辩诉交易 比较 |
Comparative Studies of Criminal Policy "Leniency to Those Who Confess Their Crimes" and Plea Bargain System |
| |
| Guo Xiang. Comparative Studies of Criminal Policy "Leniency to Those Who Confess Their Crimes" and Plea Bargain System[J]. JOurnal of Hubei University of Police, 2009, 22(6): 14-18 |
| |
| Authors: | Guo Xiang |
| |
| Affiliation: | Guo Xiang (Huangpu Customs Anti-smuggling Bureau, Guangzhou 510730, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | It is a hard choice for theoretical circles and jucicial practice whether to introduce the plea bargain system in western countries or to improve and develop the criminal policy "leniency to those who confess their crimes" in our country.We come to a conclusion that to introduce the plea bargain system is infeasible and the legalization of "leniency to those who confess their crimes" is our natural choice by comparison. |
| |
| Keywords: | leniency to those who confess their crimes plea bargain comparison |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
