Analysis and Discrimination of Single‐Layer White Architectural Paint Samples, |
| |
Authors: | Diana M. Wright Ph.D. Maureen J. Bradley Ph.D. Andria Hobbs Mehltretter M.S. |
| |
Affiliation: | Federal Bureau of Investigation, Laboratory Division, , Quantico, VA, 22135 |
| |
Abstract: | Comparative analyses of 50 single‐layer white architectural paints were conducted to determine the discrimination power using standard techniques and to provide a basis for assessing significance when paints with limited features are not discriminated. Utilizing Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 68 undifferentiated pairs resulted, yielding a discrimination of 94.45%. Adding stereomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and backscatter electron (BSE) imaging, and pyrolysis‐gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py‐GC/MS), the overall discrimination was 99.35%. The study included blind verification replicates, which resulted in the only pairs without indications of physical or chemical differences. The remaining groups of undifferentiated samples contained subtle differences by at least one technique, but were considered undifferentiated for the discrimination power evaluations. This study demonstrates a high degree of discrimination of single‐layer white architectural paints using methods of analysis often encountered in forensic science laboratories. |
| |
Keywords: | forensic science trace evidence architectural paint discrimination study comparative examinations Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive spectroscopy pyrolysis‐gas chromatography/mass spectrometry |
|
|