首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

析中国民族学北派和南派的学术倾向--以吴文藻、杨成志为例
引用本文:何国强,唐凯勋.析中国民族学北派和南派的学术倾向--以吴文藻、杨成志为例[J].思想战线,2005,31(5):132-140.
作者姓名:何国强  唐凯勋
作者单位:中山大学,广东,广州,510275
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目(11400―3191003)
摘    要:中国民族学界在20世纪三四十年代就有了"北吴南杨"之说.北学派的代表人物吴文藻和南学派的代表人物杨成志虽求学、治学和教学经历不同,学术倾向各异,但他们对中国民族学的贡献都非常突出.比较和分析南北两派,凸显其与学派的关系,客观地看待两个学派的学术传统,师其所长,大有裨益,同时,有助于中国民族学研究的发展定向.

关 键 词:吴文藻  杨成志  功能学派  历史学派
文章编号:1001-778X(2005)05-0132-09
修稿时间:2005年6月2日

A Comparison of the Academic Pursuits of the Northern School and the Southern School of Chinese Ethnology: A Case Study of Professor Wu Wenzao and Professor Yang Chengzhi
HE Guo-qiang,TANG Kai-xun.A Comparison of the Academic Pursuits of the Northern School and the Southern School of Chinese Ethnology: A Case Study of Professor Wu Wenzao and Professor Yang Chengzhi[J].The Ideological Front(Yunnan University's Journal of Social Sciences),2005,31(5):132-140.
Authors:HE Guo-qiang  TANG Kai-xun
Abstract:In the 1930s and the 1940s, there appeared the Northern School and the Southern School in Chinese ethnology. Professor Wu Wenzao was the spokesman of the Northern School while Professor Yang Chengzhi was the representative of the Southern School. Though they two had different experiences in education, teaching and academic pursuits, they both have made outstanding contributions to Chinese ethnology. A comparative and objective study of the two schools of Chinese ethnology will reveal their academic origins and help carry forward their fine traditions, which will help orientate the further development of Chinese ethnology.
Keywords:Professor Wu Wenzao  Professor Yang Chengzhi  functional school  historical school
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号